Archives
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- October 2003
- June 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- June 2002
- January 2002
- January 2001
- May 2000
- April 2000
Categories
Meta
Monthly Archives: December 2004
Ready, Aim, FireFox
Mozilla FireFox, the Open Source browser, was “officially” released at the beginning of November. Unusually for an Open Source product there was also an advertising campaign which included – believe it or not – a two page advert in The New York Times. After a month of its official release there have been over 10 million downloads.
In theory FireFox is a 1.0 release, and tradition insists that 1.0 releases of PC products are buggy, but I can confirm that it isn’t. I was an early adopter of the product and I have now been running it under Windows XP for about 6 months. This is the penalty (or reward) of being an industry analyst – you have to be an early adopter when you are tracking technology, and Bloor Research has been tracking Open Source since we first became aware of Linux in 1995.
Thus it was logical for at least one of us to try FireFox early on, and I was the volunteer guinea pig. However, I volunteered with enthusiasm because I had been experiencing “pop-up” hell with Internet Explorer and had become mouse click sick. I was even contemplating buying the Opera browser to kill the problem. I chose the pre-release version of FireFox instead, because I wanted to know about the quality of Mozilla. The quality was high.
So, given its ecstatic reception (10 million downloads qualifies as ecstatic in my view) does this mean that the browser wars are back on? Well the answer is almost certainly yes – in a way.
FireFox has already notched up an estimated 5 percent share of the browser market. The estimate is probably accurate, because Internet Explorer’s market share has dropped a corresponding 5 percent since May. Official market share figures from OneStat give 7.35 percent and from WebSideStory, 6.89 percent, but both figures apply to all Mozilla-based browsers including old versions of Netscape.
Microsoft has been tardy in addressing genuine end user dissatisfaction with IE, to the point where some users are actively seeking alternatives. The product hasn’t changed significantly in the last 3 years. That on its own might not matter much (except for the pop-up problem) were it not that there have been a rash of IE security problems in recent months. Since summer, over 20 new security holes have emerged in IE and they have been actively targeted by hackers – to install spyware, viruses or launch direct attacks. With some of the IE vulnerabilities, attacks can be initiated by the user simply clicking on a URL.
Notably (because it hit the press) officials at Pennsylvania State University have been recommending that staff and students cease to use Internet Explorer because of these security problems. Firefox does not suffer these vulnerabilities and came to market at the right time to catch this wave.
Microsoft’s problem with IE are a little ironic. Instead of having the browser as a free standing application, which it could easily have done, Microsoft bound the browser into the OS. This was a very effective way to kill off Netscape Navigator, but now it means that instead of being able to issue a completely new version of IE, it has to issue patches in the latest Service Pack. It doesn’t look like it will be able to fix the problem quickly.
So if it weren’t for the security issue (which is reason enough to consider staying with FireFox) would I still continue to use it? Well, actually the big win for me is tabbed browsing (being able to open up multiple web sites under different tabs in the same browser window). This is a useful feature. There are other good points, but actually none of them matter too much to me (there are some good plug-ins you can download, the overall design is pleasant – and I’m sure some FireFox users will post their opinions on such things below). But for me, to be honest, the browser is not a wildly important application, as long as it works.
Time will tell whether Microsoft’s IE dominance is under threat. One view is that Microsoft will respond to FireFox by achieving feature parity and will maintain its dominant market position simply through the sale of new PCs. Maybe so, but FireFox is not a solo product. There is also the ThunderBird email client and the SunBird diary. Add Open Office to this and you have a pretty good PC product portfolio. What is happening is that an Open Source stack is gradually developing on the desktop and, if it becomes popular, it really will be a threat to Microsoft’s hegemony.
Posted in IT Trends
Tagged browser;, FireFox, Internet Explorer, Linux;, Microsoft, Mozilla, Open Office;, Pennsylvania State University;, Vendor
Leave a comment