Archives
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- October 2003
- June 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- June 2002
- January 2002
- January 2001
- May 2000
- April 2000
Categories
Meta
Monthly Archives: August 2005
Pat Robertson and the UFO Crowd
Pat Robertson’s public call for the assassination of President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela (August 2005) had me surfing through the news sites to sample the instant response of America and the World in general. No blog or news site I could find dared to put a positive spin on the utterances of “reverend terminator”. The US Government was aghast and distanced itself at once. Even the most conservative sites (The Conservative Voice is an example) were only willing to defend Robertson on the basis of freedom of speech.
I have little option but to try to rectify this shamelessly one-sided reporting. Robertson was misunderstood. It is quite clear that Robertson was simply testing public reaction to the possibility of a thorough overhaul of the Ten Commandments – and where better to start than with the sixth. After all, “thou shalt not kill” has proved an annoyance to politicians and religious leaders for millennia.
Neither is it the only troublesome commandment. I personally have problems with the one about not coveting my neighbour’s Ox. (Damn fine Ox, if you ask me.)
Sadly, Robertson’s bold initiative was poorly planned and poorly executed. Only 28 of the 1290 news articles that were posted on the web within 24 hours of the Robertson’s ‘commandments initiative’ actually mentioned the sixth commandment, and most of these were decidedly negative on this burning issue. For example:
- Thou Shall Not Kill – Get it through Your Fat Head Mr. Robertson,
- God denies links to Pat Robertson, and
- Thou shalt not recommend an assassination
(which is at least suggesting a possible variation of the sixth commandment, but not in the direction that I believe Robertson was hoping for.)
Anyway, here’s a scoop (remember where you heard this first). As is my wont nowadays, when engaged in a Surfin’ Safari, I Googled for aliens i.e. I Googled “Pat Robertson” and “aliens”. I was not wasting my time. Following one of the links, I was unsurprised to discover that Pat has tested his sixth commandment upgrade idea before.
According to abduct.com in a July 8th 1997 broadcast, Robertson “launched into a diatribe against those who entertain the existence of space aliens and UFOs. He said, in a rambling discourse, that if such things exist, they are simply demons trying to lead people away from Christ. According to Robertson, the threat is so serious that people who believe in space aliens should be put to death by stoning – according to ‘God’s word.’”
I personally think they should be zapped with an alien death ray – far more appropriate, but never mind.
Finally, on this topic I discovered a Pat Robertson conspiracy theory on conspiracyplanet.com. This one’s financial. The idea is that Robertson made his comments knowing that they would cause a flight to quality in the long bond market. Apparently some off-shore fund, in which Robertson is alleged to be an investor, purchased long bonds just before Robertson broadcast his unwelcome words. As conspiracy theories go, it’s a little weak. I’m sticking with my interpretation of events. Solid analysis, if you ask me.
Posted in R&R
Tagged Entertainment, Hugo Chavez;, Humor, news site;, Pat Robertson;, Surfing Safari, Venezuela;
Leave a comment
Accountancy, Standard, Steering Committee
The Devil’s IT Dictionary Definitions
(I take no responsibility whatsoever for anyone taking any of these definitions seriously).
Accountancy
A pernicious personality disorder. An individual that suffers from this condition is referred to as an accountant. Etymologically, “actuary” has the same root as the word “accountant” and its meaning is related. An actuary is an individual who suffers from chronic accountancy.
Standard
A common well-defined and generally agreed approach to providing a capability that software vendors strictly adhere to in their marketing literature.
Steering Committee
A group of individuals assembled to carry out an activity that is best carried out by an individual, such as, for example, “steering”.
Posted in R&R
Tagged Devil\'s IT Dictionary, personality disorder;, software vendors;, Steering Committee;
Leave a comment
New Orleans – In the Wake of Katrina
If I was a follower of weather blogs, the warnings posted on IrishTrojan.com would have been loud and clear. Brendan Loy, the “Irish Trojan” who writes the blog, is a hurricane enthusiast. On August 26th, 3 days ahead of the disaster, he wrote; “If I were in New Orleans, I’d seriously consider getting the hell out of Dodge right now, just in case.”
He wasn’t being alarmist, just making reasonable interpretations of what the weather maps were telling him. A day later he was convinced New Orleans was going to be hit and he was convinced it was going to be a disaster. Reading his postings is a sobering experience. He was shouting as loud as he could, but no-one was listening. So all he could do was chronicle the disaster. (You might not be able to find his web site, by the way. It has been flooded with traffic and went off air for a while).
I followed the undoing of New Orleans myself on the web – checking the news services every hour or so. There were rumors flying, as Katrina hit, that New Orleans would be inundated, but at first the news seemed good. Katrina’s full impact was further East, smashing and mangling Gulfport and Biloxi, rather than the Big Easy. Early headlines proclaimed that New Orleans had been spared.
Well, it had been spared one thing. It had been spared a 27 foot storm surge that would surely have turned it into a lake and killed maybe half of those who stayed put – say 100,000 people. But nevertheless the levees were breached. They must have been fatally damaged in the storm – but no-one reported the flooding until the following day, when water began to rise at the rate of an inch every 5 minutes. Then came news of two breaches in the levees that were as long as a city block. How was it possible that no-one knew of these earlier?
Within about a day, power failed and communications had all but closed down. The News services, with their well-equipped on-the-spot teams were the fastest and maybe the only sources of information. The emergency services were blind and deaf, and their spokesmen knew less of what was happening than news teams – and so they said things that they now regret.
In Katrina’s aftermath, Texas has acquired about a quarter of a million new residents. Mostly, they’re in Houston, but we have 5000 or so here in Austin, encamped in the convention center. The evacuees, as they are being called, are actually refugees. They are tired and hungry. They have little more than the clothes they’re wearing; no money, no proof of identity and no idea of where their future lies.
I doubt if many of them will go back to New Orleans. The Big Easy is a wasteland and there’s nothing to go back for. What little they had was destroyed in the flood. Their children are already going to new schools and the prospects of work are better for them in Texas.
For the poor blacks of New Orleans, this is a diaspora. But for them New Orleans was no “promised land” – it was just a dangerous poverty trap that got deadly. I doubt if they’ll remember it with fondness. They will not return.
New Orleans Postscript:
According to local officials in Houston, FEMA’s computer system kept crashing during the crisis. I couldn’t find any reports on the web that explained which systems or what the problems were. Since the rescue effort went awry in many other areas and in many ways, it doesn’t come as a surprise that the systems broke too. And I doubt if there will be much focus on this when the whole sorry mess is investigated.
As it happens, computer models developed by Louisiana State University had predicted in detail what would happen to New Orleans “if the big one hit” and the levees broke. They got it just about right: 200,000 or so people would be unwilling or unable to evacuate, thousands would die, people would be housed in the Superdome, aid workers would find it difficult to get in, etc. It was mostly accurate and mostly ignored.