Archives
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- October 2003
- June 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- June 2002
- January 2002
- January 2001
- May 2000
- April 2000
Categories
Meta
Monthly Archives: November 2005
Applications of the Mobile Revolution
One of the initially unexpected events of the mobile market was the unexpected and extraordinary explosion of SMS messaging. Current figures indicate (2004) that the number of SMS messages now being sent world-wide is above 10 billion per month. This is an astonishing figure given that it approximates to 2 messages per month to every person on the planet. Of course that doesn’t give a clear picture of what is going on. What appears to be happening is that young mobile phone users, in the age range 15 to 25, are using SMS capability extensively sending each other messages at a rate of over 10 per day (10 percent of which, according to reports, say nothing more than “phone me”). On top of this, some web sites are providing SMS capability and sending messages giving news, sports scores and so on, directly to mobile phone numbers. This accounts for the traffic figures and their 100 percent growth over the last year.
When we try to identify the applications that drive major revolutions in computing, “killer applications” so to speak, we home in on useful capabilities that might become pervasive. At the beginning of the PC revolution, the killers apps were word processing and spreadsheets. Later the graphical capabilities of the GUI added presentations, desk top publishing and drawing to the mix. With the Internet revolution the killer applications were email, search engines (like Google and Yahoo), news and informational web sites and entertainment. In the latter category came pornography, which acted as a larger incentive to get onto the net than most people would like to admit.
So what has happened so far with the mobile revolution. Quite clearly as the SMS traffic shows, the early driver is messaging, which began as a paging capability but has quickly become “email by other means”. The reason for its popularity is simply that it is fast and gets to the individual, rather than to a device – or at least it will do if the individual carries a mobile phone around all the time as most users do. It is quite obvious that one of the next moves with messaging is its extension to have all the capability of email: sending messages to lists, adding attachments and so on. In addition, voice capabilities will be added, merging email and voice mail.
The other killer wireless applications are likely to come from the unique capability of the new medium, which if you ignore the fact that voice is central to the user interface, comes down to the fact that the mobile phone is carried around and can be used in most circumstances. Clearly this means that the mobile phone will absorb the capabilities of the PDA, as one or two models of phone have already done to some extent, but we can think of this in a different way.
Check Your Pockets
Examine everything that you carry with you on your person or sometimes carry with you. Most of these things can become mobile applications. Here is a fairly comprehensible list of examples:
- Watch: Consider a digital watch, which also acts as an alarm clock, gives world time and can be used as a stop watch (but rarely is). The mobile can easily do these things and using GPS could automatically adjust to local time.
- PDA: Addresses, calendar, expenses, email, alarms and all other PDA functions including data synchronization are possible.
- Keys: Given that locks are electronically controllable and wired to the internet, the mobile device can become a key to open any such lock using a personal key. With infrared or bluetooth an appropriately designed lock wouldn’t even need to be wired. This is a huge area of application.
- Remote devices: The mobile could easily usurp the role of the remote control for televisions, videos, sound systems and any other device with such an interface. This development would encourage other household goods (cookers, washing machines, etc.) to have such interfaces.
The contents of the wallet: In truth the whole contents of a wallet can be swallowed up by the mobile, we can consider them by category, as follows:
- Credit/Debit Cards, Money: Mobiles could implement or even usurp such payment mechanisms. Once electronic cash gets going it could store it and use it to make payments and could do so in any currency.
- Driving License and other ID Documents: This could include photograph as well as the usual information. A passport would also be possible on the same basis and also recording visas, entries/exits to/from various countries and other data that passport and customs authorities like to collect.
- Loyalty Cards: Clearly if it can do credit cards and passports, it can also do loyalty cards from airlines, supermarkets, petrol stations and so on.
- Membership Cards: Similarly it can store membership cards for professional associations, sports clubs, nightclubs, etc.
- Tickets: It could store tickets for theatre, cinema, trains and boats and planes or anything else for which tickets are used.
- Business cards: It can hold business card information and transfer it from one person to another.
- Receipts: It could be used to collect receipts for business expenses and for tax purposes.
- Personal effects: Other personal effects, such as photographs of wife, children, girlfriend, or whatever could be stored on the mobile device.
Naturally, all of the information items mentioned above would be protected by duplication somewhere on a secure server, but the mobile device could hold copies of them and present them in the appropriate situations.
Many of these items, keys, ID and payments in particular, are killer applications and would make the mobile device a vitally important and indispensable item in daily life. Notice how distinctly different these applications are from the killer applications of the PC or the Internet era. That is why mobile technology hails a revolution, and isn’t just an extension of the Internet.
The Leap Of The Leopard?
As regards the move to Intel, I think Steve Jobs simply concluded that he was now in a position to take a much larger share of the PC market and he could only do that with Intel hardware. With the move to Intel the “it ain’t compatible” problem melts away.
I read some article on the web this morning suggesting that Apple will eventually drop OS X in favour of Windows. It’s rare that I get to read anything that is so dead wrong. There’s not a chance in any of the circles of hell that Apple will drop OS X. The article also suggests that Apple is NOT attracting Windows users to OS X. Facts suggest otherwise. Apple converted a million or so Windows users last year, including me. Almost everyone I know in the professional space is considering Apple for their next PC. (Some won’t move, some will, but the point is that Apple has become credible. It didn’t use to be.)
And let’s not forget that 2006 is the year of the Leopard. Steve Jobs fully intends to launch Leopard, the next version of OS X, at about the same time that Microsoft brings Vista to market. As of this week Vista became a known phenomenon. The version Microsoft just released is “feature complete”. Leopard is a completely unknown phenomenon. Steve Jobs would not be organizing a head-to-head OS release if he didn’t have something up his sleeve.
What I’m guessing we’ll see in Leopard (and I am guessing) is this: Leopard will let you run Windows-in-a-box in the same way that under Windows you can run DOS-in-a-box. It will be sold for Apple Intel machines in a form that is “Windows enabled”. You will be able to install Windows (any version) if you want to-and if you do, you’ll be able to install Windows applications and run them in-a-box directly from Leopard. The OSes will live in separate partitions but the file system will be shareable and OS X will be the primary OS. With such a version of OS X, all the reasons not to use Apple (other than price) simply disappear. And Apple’s potential market increases dramatically. The number of Windows users moving to Apple will just grow.