<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is a GPU and Why is it Important?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://havemacwillblog.com/2008/04/27/what-is-a-gpu-and-why-is-it-important/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://havemacwillblog.com/2008/04/27/what-is-a-gpu-and-why-is-it-important/</link>
	<description>Oh please, not another Mac bigot</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 8 Disruptive Technology Changes &#124; HaveMacWillBlog (aka Robin Bloor’s Blog)</title>
		<link>http://havemacwillblog.com/2008/04/27/what-is-a-gpu-and-why-is-it-important/#comment-1732</link>
		<dc:creator>8 Disruptive Technology Changes &#124; HaveMacWillBlog (aka Robin Bloor’s Blog)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://havemacwillblog.com/2008/04/27/what-is-a-gpu-and-why-is-it-important/#comment-1732</guid>
		<description>[...] This strongly relates to the previous multicore disruption. Nvidia believes that the GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) will absorb the CPU in the coming years. Clearly, that would rain on Intel&#8217;s parade in no uncertain terms, and of course, the sun would shine like a diamond on Nvidia&#8217;s parade. Nvidia has a point though. As interfaces increase in sophistication it&#8217;s the GPU that does most of the work, the CPU having topped out quite a while ago. As far as I can see there&#8217;s no reason not to put a few x86 core onto a GPU and make the CPU disappear, as in a magic trick. For further details read What is a GPU and Why is it Important? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This strongly relates to the previous multicore disruption. Nvidia believes that the GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) will absorb the CPU in the coming years. Clearly, that would rain on Intel&#8217;s parade in no uncertain terms, and of course, the sun would shine like a diamond on Nvidia&#8217;s parade. Nvidia has a point though. As interfaces increase in sophistication it&#8217;s the GPU that does most of the work, the CPU having topped out quite a while ago. As far as I can see there&#8217;s no reason not to put a few x86 core onto a GPU and make the CPU disappear, as in a magic trick. For further details read What is a GPU and Why is it Important? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
