The major PC vendors; HP, Dell, Lenovo, Acer and the rest, procrastinated for far too long. They sat and watched Apple take control of the US consumer market for PCs without even a token attempt to compete. I guess they thought Apple’s sales growth would tail off, hitting some kind of glass ceiling where it would languish indefinitely and irrelevantly, as far as the PC market was concerned. Well it isn’t happening.
Apple’s gradual growth didn’t concern the PC vendors when the numbers were low. It didn’t matter much if Apple took an extra 0.2% of the market when the market itself was growing at 10%. It didn’t hurt anyone much. Having sown the breeze, the PC vendors are now reaping the whirlwind.
Apple announced its move to Intel in 2005, and consequently most commentators expected 2006 to be a difficult year for Apple. Well it certainly had a bad 2nd quarter when Mac sales grew at only 4%, but that was a blip. Overall Mac sales grew by 16.6% in 2006. In 2007 Apple started to motor with Mac sales growth of 33% while the US PC market (Apple’s primary market) was growing at a mere 5.3%.
In the first quarter of this year Apple shipped 2.3 million Macs, a 51% increase over the same period a year ago, while its revenue from its computers grew by 54%. And in that quarter Apple accounted for 66% of US store bought PC Sales that cost over $1000 (according to the NPD Group).
Here’s the full set of figures:
| Sales | Desktops | Laptops | Overall |
| Above $1000 | 70% | 64% | 66% |
| Whole market | 14% | 14% | 14% |
The Consequences
So what’s happening?
There’s no reason to believe that the 1st quarter of 2008 is anomalous in any way. Just to confirm this, NPD Group was reporting that Apple’s sales growth was 50% in April too. And if Apple continues to grow at this rate then it will sell something in the region of an extra 4 million Macs this year - and that is going to hurt all the PC vendors - and Microsoft too. In those circumstances it will be difficult for any other vendor to exhibit any growth at all. Within a Year Apple will overtake Toshiba in terms of units sold and a year later it will march past Lenovo.
The reality is that when Macs compete head to head with PCs they win. There is no Microsoft lock-in any more. Vista has failed to compete and the Mac is what the consumer wants. For that reason, the Mac is now inveigling its way into business computing. If Apple chooses to enter the lower cost computer market then the PC vendors will have nowhere to go. But Apple may not do that.
It’s the OS, Stupid!
The PC vendors problem is that they cannot differentiate, and so they cannot compete directly with Apple. Apple may impress with brilliant physical machine designs, but its big differentiation is OS X. The only PC vendor who competes at that level is ASUS with its Eee PC and I suspect that other PC vendors will follow suit. With Linux they can, at least, add their own customization and actively do something to make a difference.
Otherwise the PC vendors will just have to wait for Windows 7, but you just know that Apple will leapfrog Windows 7 well before it arrives. Windows 7 will not fix the problem for them.














Hear hear!
Methinks Apple’s game plan has roots in the Flywheel Principle espoused by Jim Collins (”Good to Great”). They have a core ideology, and they stick to it for the long term with laser-like focus. The momentum is subtle in the early stages, but it’s also cumulative … plus they can still adjust their biz strategies as they go.
I’d like to believe that you’re right. But we saw xp go through a phase like vista is doing. The market really, really does not want to upgrade the OS. I still prefer 2000 pro over xp. If they’d just fixed the bugs with zero upgrades, i’d be happier. I mean, can you put vista on the internet without a firewall?
And what’s this BS about over $1000? I haven’t bought an over $1000 pc since 1987. Current box: Athlon, 1.5 GB RAM, 320 GB disk, 2 dvd drives, flat bed scanner, color printer, 21″ monitor, wifi router. Under $500.
Still, an eepc shipped with linux is a really cool thing.
As regards the trend to Apple, the fact seems to be that the home PC buyer is willing to “upgrade” the OS in a move to Apple. The difference between XP and Vista seems to be great enough to make a switch to OS X seem better than a shift to Vista.
As regards “over $1000″, about 20% of the consumer PC market is for machines over $1000. In contrast to you, I’ve not bought a machine under $1000 ever - but I have a tendency to invest in RAM from the outset.
[...] and what I have seen here is really impressive!! Anyone still wonder why I have been Mac? He lists reasons here why the Mac is a success. Also, search around- he has a very good site.. Now back to more of it for [...]
Its a generation thing. Apple represents mobility, flexibility and reliability. What self respecting sub 30 buyer has time for DLL issues?
What does windoze do over osx? run Office - oh yeah don’t forget Neo Office or Zoho or Google Docs or anyone one of the gazillion free web services that osx works great with and windows is pretending are not important.
Look Bill, you had it good, you got a jump start, ripped off Apple OS for decades, but really … what next … the big ass table? the big ass wall?
Nope Windoze peaked at XPSP2 - who cares? Life ona Mac and Web2.0 is perfect … works … right out the box … anyone wanna mention windows iphone rip off.
Bah, the world is changing, we want to publish, to make and share - things windows never did.
Lets be pirates (again)
Leave A Reply