Category Archives: IT Trends

The Coming Contest Between IBM and Intel

If you caught my previous posting Who Is Really Acquiring Sun?, you will have concluded either that I’m missing some detail of the situation or that IBM is going to walk away with the high-end Unix market, while both Oracle/Sun and HP fight a profitless rearguard action. The IBM Power chip has treated its competitors the way that Jet Li treats his assailants in a martial arts movie, when they believe, quite incorrectly, that they have him cornered. There are bruises and broken bones, and only Jet Li walks away from the incident unscathed.

I-and-I

As far as I can tell, the high-end Unix market contest is over. SPARC will never recover and Itanium can only be classified as the walking wounded. It is never going to compete with Power. Consequently, another equally interesting battle is about to commence, which can be thought of as the contest of I-and-I: IBM and Intel. The outcome of this one is much less certain and there isn’t necessarily going to be a winner because, as in the game of chess, the rules of engagement admit the possibility of a draw.

Let’s paint the picture so that you can see what’s happening out there…

The Battle in Device land

Intel is the 500 pound gorilla in the chip market, but it is not in a completely comfortable position. You can divide Intel’s market between client devices and server devices. Once upon a time client computers (PCs) and server computers (servers with Intel chips) were almost identical. If you wanted a server, then you just bought a PC with a cheap monitor and that was your server. It was excellent value too. Cheap, cheap, cheap.

There was sufficient similarity between PCs and servers for Wintel (Intel and Microsoft) to capture a big percentage of the server market, simply by the force of numbers. From an engineering perspective, it was never a good idea for client and server to be the same kind of unit, but the numbers swamped that engineering nicety – and the commodity Intel server was born (running either Windows or Linux, according to taste.) Engineering sanity was simply swamped by the tsunami of cheapness.

That age has passed. With the monotonous persistence of Moore’s Law, the PC gradually became an engineering joke. It may have had a hugely powerful processor, but the processor rarely did anything – unless you ran some kind of truly heavy graphical workload. The PC chip was a jumbo jet engine strapped to the back of a bicycle.

The PC workloads that could be improved by processor power were, almost exclusively, the graphical workloads. So now, what really matters on client devices is graphical processing – the graphics card and the GPU. This reality has pushed NVIDIA into competition with Intel on the desktop. To add to that, AMD’s purchase of ATI (providing it with a little skin in this game too) has kept it relevant despite, it’s decline in the face of an Intel onslaught. There is more to be said about this, but I’ll save it for another article.

Mobile devices, many of them powered by ARM chips, are rising up, and just to complicate matters, IBM dominates the computer gaming market, providing the chips for Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft – although not identical chips. Intel still rules “the client” but, even though it finally managed to draw Apple into its orbit, it cannot claim dominance. Against the gain of Apple (which previously used a version of IBM’s power chip) it lost the games console market and it has a very weak position in the mobile phone market.

The point in mentioning the competition in this key market is to note the fact that Intel is in no position to employ the joyous tactic of “dumping” in the server market – i.e. using guaranteed profits in the client market in order to dump product in the server market at below cost, to destroy the competition.

Click to continue reading “The Coming Contest Between IBM and Intel”

Posted in IT Trends | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The iPhone and the Smartphone Market

Look at the sales figures for the last quarter – the second quarter of the year (2Q09) in a recessionary year, and you see that the sale of smart phones is growing like a rampant weed. Sales grew from 32,272,700 in the previous year (2Q09) to 40,962,800. That’s just under 27% growth when the market for other electronic products is in decline, or even steep decline.

The iPhone Phenomenon

The driver of the market is surely the iPhone, which exhibited extraordinary growth. A year ago when the iPhone was already a phenomenon, Apple sold a mere 892,000 units in the quarter, for 2.8% market share. Admittedly Apple had not yet laid down carrier deals in many markets and so those figures depended mostly on the US and one or two countries in Europe.

Apple still has not colored in every country on the world map and is only just finalizing in China, which will be a huge market. And despite that it sold 5,434,700 units, giving it a growth rate of 609% and vaulting it into 3rd position in the global market with a 13.3% share compared to RIM’s 18.7% share and Nokia’s 45% share.

A Thing Apart

We shouldn’t forget that Apple’s competitors are playing catch-up. It’s no longer just about the phone. It’s now also about the applications, and right now, Apple has such a lead over the competition that you almost feel as though someone should stop the fight. There are two vectors to this. The first is that Apple had the got web browsing on the iPhone right, partly because it invested in a high resolution screen from the get go, making the screen larger in practice than it appears, but also it enabled a whole set of geographical applications that link from maps to apps on the device. Secondly Apple got the developer ecosystem working so that now the vast majority of mobile app developers are pointed at the iPhone and use development software that it Apple oriented.

This will take a lot of catching up, and to make matters worse, a whole new generation of geographical applications are starting to hit the market which can overlay the physical view of a scene with information so you can actually see where the ATM or restaurant is just by looking through the viewfinder of the iPhone camera. While its competitors are still trying to get their application stores active Apple already has over 70,000 software products to offer iPhone users (at last count).

Counting just the handset sales, Apple’s iPhone now accounts for 8% of all mobile phone revenue, but – and here’s the kicker – a huge 32% of the industry’s handset profits. That’s according to figures published by Bernstein Research and based on handset sales in the first half of 2009 – when Apple earned an estimated $5 billion revenue and took its place as the fifth largest player by revenue – behind Nokia, Samsung, RIM, and LG, none of whom have a PC business or a Media business or a software business.

It’s the End-to-end Sales Model

Pleasant though smartphone are the only reason to own one is to run applications and view media. If making calls or sending text is what you’re after you can pick-up a phone that does that for almost nothing. Apple is the only player in the game that has a true end-to-end sales model for music, video and applications. It has the content and application ecosystem sewn up and everyone else is a bit player.

It is also innovating at a rate of knots. It will not be at all surprising to see Apple launching a tablet device that is, well, a platform for playing content and running iPhone apps. There is no other vendor that is even thinking of doing that, and they’ll all start quaking in their shoes when Apple does.

In the iPhone market, Apple is a company that is in desperate need of a strong competitor. Right now there is no sign of one. Microsoft looks like a busted flush in this market, Google is only just getting started and RIM and Nokia are clear also-rans. The only thing stopping Apple from accidentally acquiring a monopoly is the exclusive carrier deals it is tied up with.

Apple will not continue to grow at 600% in this market – mathematics forbids it – but it won’t be long before it displaces Nokia. Maybe a year, maybe two.

Posted in Apple, IT Trends | Leave a comment

Microsoft v Apple: Whistling in the Dark

Fear and Loathing in Redmond

“Great occasions do not make heroes or cowards; they only unveil them to the eyes of men. Silently and imperceptibly, as we wake or sleep, we grow strong or weak; and at last some crisis shows us what we’ve become.”

It’s an astute observation from Brooke Foss Wescott, which can be applied to companies just as much as it can be applied to men. So let’s apply it to Microsoft.

Recently, Steve Ballmer got all loquacious at a meeting with financial analysts, many of whom were using Apple laptops. He was moved to comment on the preponderance of Macbooks, referring to Apple as “a fine company” that was prospering from a low-volume, high-price strategy.” He then proclaimed that Microsoft hadn’t lost market share to Apple over the past year and any changes in the reported market share numbers were a rounding error.

Nobody needed to butt in and tell him that his statistical skills needed a little polishing, because he contradicted himself in the next sentence by saying that “market share gains by Apple cost Microsoft nothing” and “hopefully we’ll take share back from Apple.”

Math Problems

Ballmer is whistling in the dark. Microsoft’s revenues collapsed 17 percent in the last quarter, mostly from the decline in Windows revenues, while Apple still managed to post growth in Mac sales – albeit of a modest 4 percent. Meanwhile the iPhone was taking off like a rocket.

The tendency of CEO’s whose companies are in trouble to become suddenly inept with statistics is legendary, but it’s not in a CEO’s nature to stand up and proclaim “the competition is killing us.” But that’s what’s happening to Microsoft. Competition is killing it.

The twin threats of Apple and Google are gradually bringing Microsoft to its knees. Microsoft works fine as a monopoly and it has been skilled in maintaining its monopoly with intelligent and innovative monopolistic practices. But it’s no longer good at competing outside its monopolistic domain.

It was once a skilled marketeer and public relations ringmaster, but no longer. You don’t need marketing skills to maintain a monopoly, so they atrophy. It was once even an innovator in some respects, although innovation has never been its forté. Microsoft’s business model always placed the highest priority on market share  and innovation is not a great contributor to building market share. With Microsoft it was mostly about bundling and the drag-along of monopoly power.

Arrogance is the Curse

In The Prince, Machievelli advised famously; “Never wound an enemy, except fatally.”

Bill Gates should have read the book and he would have known never to give Apple breathing space. By the late 1990s Microsoft must have thought it was bullet proof. It had laid the Netscape threat to rest and, even though it faced anti-trust action, it was sweeping all competition away in every direction. Sun, IBM, Oracle and Novell all seeemd to be ont he run from Microsoft.

Wintel reigned supreme and Microsoft was swimming in its own Kool-Aid. And that’s when Bill Gates put to rest the long running dispute with Apple, over Microsoft Windows infringement of Apple patents. Microsoft invested $150 million in Apple and agreed to develop and ship future versions of Microsoft Office, Internet Explorer, and development tools for the Mac. The announcement was made jointly by Bill (via satellite) and the newly appointed Steve Jobs at Macworld Expo.

At that time both the world and Microsoft regarded Apple as a basket case. A couple of years later, Apple was selling its iMac in 5 different colors and its marketing messages were beginning to resound a little.

Bill Gates remarked, mockingly; “The one thing Apple’s providing now is leadership in colors. It won’t take long for us to catch up with that.”

Well a decade has passed, and the whole of the PC industry still hasn’t caught up with the Apple’s design leadership. There’s no guaranteeing that it ever will. Microsoft should have strangled Apple when it had the chance, but Bill probably thought Apple was dying anyway. The boot is now on the other foot. Microsoft is the wounded animal, not Apple.

In the aftermath of Microsoft’s decline, commentators will argue about whether Steve Ballmer was the architect of Microsoft’s misfortunes or whether the rot had set in long before his CEO tenure began. It will be a subject worthy of debate, but the latter theory is more compelling. Corporate culture was the problem – or should I say – it is the problem.

Playing Catch-up

Apple has left Microsoft in dust in so many ways. Up to now Microsoft’s competitive strategy has been all “me too.” Nice interface on OS X, well “me too” with Vista. Nice music store with iTunes, well “me too” with MSN Music. Good business with the iPod, well “me too” with Zune. Impressive Apple Stores, well “me too.” (See The “Bootleg Apple” Strategy and Why It Will Fail).

Microsoft has finally realized that the second mover is always a move behind. It’s an advantage when you’re playing monopoly and you’ve got your hotels on all the pricey locations, but in the game of technology leadership it’s a huge negative. There’s no evidence that Microsoft has the wherewithal to react quickly any more. When you need to change direction quickly, momentum is not an advantage – it becomes inertia. That’s what has happened to Microsoft. It still has momentum, but that now hinders it.

Innovation is the key to Microsoft recovering and at last it’s starting to perform, even though it’s very late in the game. Particularly impressive is the new X-Box “virtual reality” interface it is set to deliver. It’s real and it’s groundbreaking and it’s a pity it’s only a sideshow – like the X-Box itself. Microsoft can do this and when it does, it is a force to be reckoned with, but Microsoft has wasted years watching its foes grow stronger. So it’s probably too little too late.

Look Out! There’s A Monster Coming

What Microsoft really suffers from in its competition with Apple: It has no phone platform worth talking about. If anything, it’s RIM and Palm that compete with Apple in this market, and they have their work cut out (see The iPhone and the Smartphone Market). Nokia may be a strong player in the smartphone game – it certainly used to be. Google is now suddenly there and attracting attention. But Microsoft is nowhere. It’s smartphone strategy was lame from the start – and now it just hobbles along.

Think back. Microsoft stormed into the computer business and began to eat into the computer industry from below: smaller devices, low entry costs, cheaper software, larger numbers and great margins. That surge was irresistible and it carved out a huge market share as a consequence. Well it’s happening again. But this time the industry being eaten from beneath is the PC industry and right now the vendor that is carving out the territory is Apple – soon to be joined by Google.

The coup de grâce here will be the Apple tablet. See There’s Another Apple Revolution Coming for the full details, but the skinny is this. The new Apple tablet will be a big bad iPhone. It will start to consume the laptop market from the get go. It will be what the Netbook should have been, but never was.

Apple now has 90 percent of the high-end PC market. It has slaughtered the competition in that area. But Ballmer thinks that’s unimportant, because it’s low volume. Well take a look at the iPhone’s grip on the hearts and minds of consumers and watch what happens to the Apple tablet, Mr Ballmer. It won’t be low volume. Apple is coming at you from both directions and you’re caught in the sandwich.

A new market is about to emerge. Microsoft could have been there and should have been there, but it got complacent – and now it’s nowhere.

Arrogance is the curse.

Posted in Apple, IT Trends | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

There's Another Apple Revolution Coming

No-one is going to dispute that Apple created a technology revolution with the iPhone. The device impacted the business model of every company in the mobile communications market, both the carriers and the device manufacturers – and it has impacted a few other companies that weren’t really in that market, like TiVo, Netflix and Amazon. We recently had Nintendo saying that Apple was impacting its market. Since when was Apple a games company? Well – since it launched the App Store .

The iPhone was disruptive beyond being a rethink of what a smart phone is. It disrupted whole industry business models. Ten years ago the mobile carriers were riding high. They were anticipating the revenue they’d generate from  image traffic, video traffic, games traffic, etc. They were hoping to set up portals which users would access for music or video or games and they’d put a charge on every kind of transaction. Those dreams are dead. The twin assassins were iTunes and the iPhone.

Instead the carriers are now reduced to charging usurious rates for voice and text messages. Some of the carriers are dining well on this diet, but it’s temporary. They are bit part players in someone else’s movie.

Well. It’s all about to happen again.

The iPhone By Other Means

Apple is planning to introduce a tablet PC in the coming months. What isn’t certain is whether it will be announced in September or later. Apple can be expected to announce new iPods around September time, but if it announces a tablet PC at that time, there’s a risk that it could cannibalize its own laptop sales. However that’s only if the tablet can be a laptop replacement. The laptop sales we’re talking about here are the back-to-college sales which traditionally cause a spike in the sales curve.

So expect Apple to do something to lock in the current laptop purchases before the new Apple tablet is available. As a business, Apple is too savvy not to do that – but Apple will not want to miss sales for its tablet in the last quarter of the year, which has always been its best quarter.

While we know for sure that Apple is going to introduce a tablet of some kind, from rumors out of Taiwan, we know very little else, so everything that follows is speculative. The main point is this:

Apple will disrupt the Netbook market in the same way that it disrupted the smart phone market.

That means completely. Here is how:

  • The Apple tablet will not be anything like a Netbook. That means “not in price, not in use, not in capability, not in any way.” No-one will compare it to a Netbook.
  • The Apple tablet will not be a laptop wannabe – it will be an evolution of the iPhone and the iPod Touch. It will have a touch interface, no keyboard, screen that works in both portrait and landscape mode, memory only storage. It will run the iPhone version of OS X.
  • The Apple tablet will be extensible via Bluetooth. If you want keyboards and a head set or ear piece that will be via Blueooth. Naturally WiFi will be fully supported. There will be lots of opportunity for third party add-ons – stands to put it on, etc.
  • The Apple tablet will be a category killer. Therefore it will be a video player, a music player and an ebook reader. Those categories don’t make much sense any more as separate categories. It will also do anything a NetBook can do, except run Linux or Windows.
  • The Apple tablet will be a media device. The iPhone/iPod Touch is not a sophisticated media device. The screen is too small. We need not expect anything sophisticated here, except for video playback. The camera and video capability will probably be an improvement on the iPhone.
  • The Apple tablet will be fed from the App Store and iTunes. Well, duh. But note that this makes it a different beast from a laptop. The tablet will start life with a whole inventory of possible applications. There are currently over 65,000 applications that run on the iPhone, some of which won’t make much sense on the tablet, bot most of which will be fine.
  • The Apple tablet will sell in the $500 to $900 price range. Apple will fill the price gap between the iPhone/iPod Touch and the lowest priced laptop. The price won’t matter, because there will be no other device like it. Nevertheless the price will seem high on introduction. That’s how Apple plays the ball.
  • The Apple tablet will come in two distinct versions, comparable to iPhone and iPod Touch. One will emphasize 3G/4G and the other will emphasize WiFi. There will be carrier deals bundled in with the phone version. There will probably also be memory options along the lines of; lower price (too little) higher price (enough).

There is no possibility of Apple not disrupting its laptop market in the long run. Apple will either know that already or come to realize that very quickly. Either way, its reaction should and probably will be to eat its own laptop market in the long run.

Rethinking the Laptop

The Apple tablet wont just be a rethink of the Netbook, it will also be a rethink of the laptop. As with the iPhone, the laptop makers will be forced to follow suit in time. Peripheral markets like ebook readers (including the Kindle) and video players will be badly hit by it. If Apple gets it right it will be a huge success, comparable to the iPhone. Apple will sell these devices in large numbers – much greater than the numbers of laptops it sells.

Posted in Apple, IT Trends | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

CA: Dancing With Dinsoaurs

The revival of the mainframe, isn’t just due to IBM’s continuing investment in it. CA is stirring this pot as well, and with a high degree of enthusiasm. But before I describe what it’s doing, let’s first review the current state of the mainframe market.

  • 70% of world’s business critical data still lives on the mainframe. It never left home.
  • The mainframe dominates the high-end server market with over 35% of  market share by revenue.
  • More than 60% of new mainframe capacity sold since 2000 is running “new-to-the-dinosaur” workloads (i.e., Linux, J2EE, ERP, etc.)
  • No matter how you count it (by MIPS or revenue or units or customer base) the mainframe market has been growing very healthily. If you count by MIPS then growth has been in double digits for over a decade. (Until the onset of the recession when all server sales went south)
  • The platform has acquired over 500 new customers since 2000 following a barren period in the mid-1990s. Migration away from the mainframe has tailed off.
  • The Dinosaurs are back, and they ‘re angry.

Why are the Dinosaurs so Bouncy?

The important point to understand is that the mainframe is cheap highly efficient computing. It’s as simple as that. The primary barrier to the use of the mainframe is adoption costs. You have to hire mainframe expertise and it’s a little thin on the ground. And you can’t buy entry level servers for a few thousand dollars either.

Nevertheless, every mainframe IT executive I’ve come in contact with in the last ten years that closely monitors data center costs has told me that the mainframe is by far the least expensive server computing in the data center. One company I’ve heard of – a large bank – measures mainframe cost at about half the cost of commodity Intel servers!

Mainframe Linux is also responsible to some degree for the resurgence of the mainframe. It has been a huge boon. It is possible to configure a new Linux server (virtual server) in minutes on the mainframe, whereas it can take days if you wanted a new physical Linux or Windows server. Even in virtualized environments VMware has a long way to go before it matches the virtualization management capabilities of the mainframe. More importantly, with mainframe Linux, it is possible to run all the Internet applications (web server, CMS, database, etc.) on the mainframe – which meant extremely fast communications to back end systems or applications built in J2EE.

Linux mainframe usage is growing strongly. A recent CA sponsored survey of IT executives in large companies (revenue $2bn or more) showed that 93% of these companies are growing their use of mainframe Linux – nearly half of them at an annual rate of 20% to 40%.

CA: Taming the Dinosaur

If you are familiar with the mainframe it won’t be a surprise that CA is delighted with the robust health of the mainframe. After all it has a broad portfolio of mainframe products from which it harvests maintenance revenues. However, you may be surprised at the level to which it is investing research and marketing dollars in the once moribund platform.

Chris O’Malley, EVP and GM for CA’s mainframe Business Unit has coined the term Mainframe 2.0 to describe teh mainframe’s resurgence. Mainframe 2.0 is like Web 2.0 only a little more Jurassic. He speaks confidently about CA delivering mainframe products that are “best in class quality, support and platform exploitation.” There is some justification for his confidence.

Click to continue reading “CA: Dancing With Dinsoaurs”

Posted in Briefings, IT Trends | Tagged , , | 2 Comments